Your subscription to "The theory can't predict with precision what will happen, but it knows everything that can happen and it will tell you the probability of all these things happening.". so much for no good or bad, that is unless it is convienent. IE 11 is not supported. The brain wasn't born yesterday. Bleep raises thought-provoking questions about science and its relationship to spirituality and metaphysics. However, it contends that the empty space is not that empty, it is only the human mind that is unable to see beyond the emptiness. "But that's two leaps beyond what scientists believe to be true.". [1], The films co-director, Mark Vicente, would go on to co-found The Knife Media, a pro-Trump digital news outlet linked to NXIVM. Once they do bump into each other they form their regular little selves. Interspersed with the plot were interviews with various supposed scientists with something to say about quantum physics, consciousness, God, etc. John Hagelin was obviously a good phenomenologists. Next factoid: Crime in Washington, D.C. was reduced 25 percent by prayer--and made believers of the D.C. cops! Everyone said that you have to see this movie! So I did. Hard to get your head around What the Bleep Do We Know. Once anything goes, you can have anything you want. Hobbs also discusses Hagelin's experiment with Transcendental Meditation and the Washington DC rate of violent crime, saying that "the number of murders actually went up". You can't bring good things to you by thinking about them. Featuring interviews with scientists and theologians, this compelling film thrusts the viewer into a world where science and spirituality intersect. Interviews with scientists and authors, animated bits, and a storyline involving a deaf photographer are used in this docudrama to illustrate the link between quantum mechanics, neurobiology, human consciousness and day-to-day reality. As one of the film's characters gushes early in the proceedings, 'The moment we acknowledge the quantum self, we say that somebody has become enlightened'. Im not personally familiar with any of Hagelins work but Im sure theres some good physics in there. . Everyone is still talking about the movie What the Bleep Do We Know!? John Hagelin, PhD, describes a study he did in Washington in 1992. You can't change the world by thinking about it. For many years in the early-mid-eighties, the Maharishi was pushing N=8 supergravity as the unified field theory, I remember a colorful poster explaining how it agreed exactly with his philosophy that many people posted on their walls. We'll never know. Invariably only about half the people tested ever notice a woman in a gorilla suit walking across the middle of the screen during the game. Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. what the bleep do we know watch online free, what the bleep do we know trailer, what the bleep do we know movie, what the bleep do we know debunked, what the bleep do . The pity of it is that there are fascinating conversations going on in the science-and-religion sphere. Suddenly people who were talking about subatomic particles are alluding to alternate universes and cosmic forces, all of which can be harnessed in the interest of making Ms. Matlin's character feel better about her thighs. But what quantum mechanics doesn't change about the universe is, if you want to change things, you still have to do something. based on this subject nature contained, I hold these 2 films in a very high regard. But that doesn't mean that astrology is true. Last night I went to see a movie which was advertised as being about quantum physics, called What the Bleep Do We Know?. The general idea was that since quantum mechanics supposedly says that there isnt one reality, but an infinite number of possibilities, one just has to be enlightened to an awareness of this, and then you can make whatever you want happen. subscription yet. The movie contains interviews from such leaders in their fields as: Candace. log out. and of course the big guy himself, Ramtha. A lot of the propaganda from them was hilarious, especially whenever candidates attempted to hold public speeches and performing demonstrations of yogic flying. You can be accurate in one or the other, but not in both. What the Bleep Do We Know postulates the existence of a spiritual connection between the realms of quantum physics and consciousness, demonstrating this through inspiring visual effects, story-telling and interviews with experts. A moderately low-budget independent film, it was promoted using viral marketing methods and opened in art-house theaters in the western United States, winning several independent film awards before being picked up by a major distributor and eventually grossing over $10 million. Somehow the main character of the movie was learning these amazing facts about quantum physics, and this then helps her deal with her anxiety attacks, bad body image and sex addiction (the film really goes off the rails in a bizarre scene where she is the photographer at a wedding party that turns into a grotesque kind of orgy). Early in the film, she is trying to take portraits at the train station, but nobody seems to be buying. According to Joo Magueijo, professor in theoretical physics at Imperial College, the film deliberately misquotes science. Only the Shaman knows, and we're about 500 years too late to ask him. The bits and pieces of matter that make up sub-atomic particles (protons, neutrons and electrons) don't exist in any handy, measurable way unless they're interacting with one another. Join the Cosmic Log corps by signing up as my Facebook friend or hooking up on Twitter. They're coming into the marketplace hungry for direction, but they don't want some person who claims to have all the answers. About. Filmed to promote a new age philosophy based on a very, very broad interpretation of quantum physics, the movie was funded by J. is a 2004 American pseudo-scientific film that posits a spiritual connection between quantum physics and consciousness. Q: But isn't everything really connected? Hagelin was a grad student at Harvard when I was an undergrad and I met him when we were in the same quantum field theory class. Featured individuals [ edit] The film features interview segments of: It was clearly time to check the facts for myself. I want to mention another point Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. And you'd do the study without knowing what had been 'said' to the water specimens, so your subjective opinions wouldn't colour the results. - - Quantum mechanics is a replacement for the phrase "anything goes." Hope you dont mind me butting in, just thought you might like to see these facts which are so far undisputed about the film. The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. They don't go anywhere, Fred. All those things can be attributed to quantum mechanics first of all, because it's so poorly understood by the public, and especially because it's so verifiably weird. Joe Dispenza, former Ramtha School of Enlightenment teacher, This page was last edited on 13 February 2023, at 23:23. Can the weirdness of quantum mechanics make you well, or make you wealthy? Unfortunately hes written no papers after 1995, see, http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?rawcmd=find+a+hagelin&FORMAT=WWW&SEQUENCE=. So you forgive the film's jelly-baby graphics, daggy storyline, and that Gabor sister channelling a warrior spirit from Atlantis. (Refugees in Sudan or people in Baghdad would have an even tougher time accepting the film's premise.). [an error occurred while processing this directive]. It's used as an excuse to be even weirder. To accomplish that, you would have to invoke "new physics," Dr. Schumm says, in which the explanation can be verified or falsified through experiment. It's actually the machine that's the observer, not the human who's jotting down results. But the movie gradually moves to quantum 'insights' that lead a woman to toss away her antidepressant medication, to the quantum channeling of Ramtha, the 35,000-year-old Lemurian warrior, and on to even greater nonsense." Has this experiment been replicated or verified? Having watched this travesty of a movie, any real scientist worth his quarks might be gun-shy about joining the debate. I started out thinking that BLEEP 2 would be a ground-breaking update covering ideas and discoveries in quantum physics, brain neurology and consciousness studies introduced over a decade ago. [13] The American Chemical Society's review criticizes the film as a "pseudoscientific docudrama", saying "Among the more outlandish assertions are that people can travel backward in time, and that matter is actually thought. That's what makes the world so interesting. Some argue that the same quantum processes seen in the universe around us have an effect on consciousness as well, but physicist Lawrence Krauss says that's highly debatable. Filmed in Portland, Oregon, What the Bleep Do We Know!? In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time "students" of Ramthas' School of enlightenment. Hobbs further disputed the film's use of the ten percent of the brain myth. Yet, the battle still ranges, and we now know where we can class the distinctions of LQG and String theorists? Filename F:\torrent\What the Bleep Do We Know_2CD\disc one\09 What the Bleep.wav Peak level 100.0 % Extraction speed 8.6 X Track quality 100.0 % Test CRC 2A67087E Copy CRC 2A67087E Accurately ripped (confidence 4) [55AC2A89] (AR v1) Copy OK Track 10 Filename F:\torrent\What the Bleep Do We Know_2CD\disc one\10 Circle the Sun.wav Peak level 100.0 % Since its release in April 2004, this independent film has become a cult hit, playing to packed houses and grossing over $7.5 . Scientists in the physical realm also hypothesize that matter is solid (Wilson 5). The idea that our own perceptions can't be trusted is not new, of course. What the #$*! This has led to accusations, both formal and informal, directed towards the film's proponents, of spamming online message boards and forums with many thinly veiled promotional posts. Gripping stuff, but nothing to do with our daily lives. Some lost their entire life savings. This will be revisited if anyone else tries to circumvent a channel ban in future.PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:I'm citing \"Fair Use\" under US Copyright Act, Title 17 512 (g)(f), specifically those clauses covering Comment and Criticism, as well as the DMCA.http://www.aclunc.org/issues/technology/blog/asset_upload_file939_6218.pdfAlso \"Fair Dealing\" under UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 c.48, Part 1(Copyright) Section 79.4ahttp://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/ukpga_19880048_en_4Censorship is NOT a valid argument.This is the first part of my critical analysis of \"What The Bleep Do We Know?! Beliefnet is a lifestyle website providing feature editorial content around the topics of inspiration, spirituality, health, wellness, love and family, news and entertainment. for only $16.05 $11/page. According to his books, water exposed to loving words shows brilliant and attractive patterns, while water exposed to negative thoughts forms incomplete patterns. last of a series of columns written for Scientific American, Why great minds can't grasp consciousness. For starters you'd have to take a lot of samples from different parts of each ice specimen. The film's central point--that reality is a construct of our own brains--seems rife with intriguing cinematic possibilities. ?, with over 15 hours of material on three double-sided DVDs. Human everyday life consists of many routines and necessary things that are mostly physical such as work, school, a number of chores or minor responsibilities, and hopefully sleep. You should be wary whenever you hear something like, "Quantum mechanics connects you with the universe" or "quantum mechanics unifies you with everything else." "Our brain receives 400 billion bits/second of information, but we're only aware of 2000 bits/second. I was really impressed and although it sounded totally crazy, the Einsteinian language that their brochures were using had nearly convinced me that they really know something about fundamental physics. You are free to comment as you wish. "Your mind can't tell the difference between what it sees and what it remembers" Dr Joseph Dispenza (Chiropractor ) in What the Bleep Do We Know? ", "The movie is saying that somehow we can all get together and, with our collective thought processes, we can influence the outcome" of physical events - be they life experiences or scientific experiments, notes Bruce Schumm, a particle physicist at the University of California at Santa Cruz. The following persons in the film have all spoken at RSE and sold books there. Film / What the #$*! "[10], What the Bleep Do We Know!? If I didnt know any better, I would have thought it was something straight out of a Cheech and Chong movie. Certainly, our attitudes and brain chemistry affect how we see the world and get through life. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for What the Bleep Do We Know? Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. 8. Lawrence Krauss: I think it's probably one of the most abused concepts in physics among the public. Featuring two (!) (Physicists should take part of the blame for this confusion. But when animated, jive-talkin' human cells start dancing around in what appears to be the heroine's frontal lobe, all questions of spirituality pale before the sheer dreadfulness of this movie. Get ABC Sciences weekly newsletter Science Updates, The 'underground astronaut' in search of ancient bones, Voyager probes still signalling from the edge of the Solar System, Solar eclipses: Everything you need to know, Five ways your smartphone could help save lives, Chinese scientists use satellite to smash quantum entanglement record, Einstein's light bending theory directly observed in distant stars for first time, Third gravitational wave detection puts new spin on black holes. Amit Gotswami So does classical physics. Do we know" . Then comes "Carl Sagan Meets Madame Blavatsky." Not exactly, Amit. On the whole they were a bunch of complete flakes, although one of them (David Albert) is a philosopher of science here at Columbia. We Intercut with these metaphysical ponderings is a soapy fictional narrative starring Marlee Matlin as a broken-hearted photographer. That sounds like magic. The main weird thing about them was they were printed on pink paper instead of white. The experts start "proving" that humans create their own reality by getting too attached to certain brain chemicals. Staff meetings are tedious enough give me a conscious mind with a decent filter device any day. With quantum mechanics, there's a notion that observers affect the things that they're observing. Regular indicators of violent crime told a different story the number of murders actually went up. When they use the word 'observe', they actually mean 'interact with', not look at or think about.). 2. Particles are fluctuations the rules of physics say it's perfectly fine for them to exist at some time and/or place and to be non-existent at another time and/or place. 2. . What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramthas School of Enlightenment. How had the discussion from WTB (What the BLEEP) moved and evolved? The question is, how far down the rabbit hole, do you wanna go? Cast. In the film, during a discussion of the influence of experience on perception, Candace Pert notes a story, which she says she believes is true, of Native Americans being unable to see Columbus's ships because they were outside their experience. We want to bridge divides to reach everyone. Directors William Arntz, Betsy Chasse Starring Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie Genres Science Fiction, Comedy, Drama, Documentary, Fantasy, Special Interest Science Monitor has expired. But this only applies to sub-atomic particles a rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. This message will appear once per week [14] Amongst the assertions in the film that have been challenged are that water molecules can be influenced by thought (as popularized by Masaru Emoto), that meditation can reduce violent crime rates of a city,[15] and that quantum physics implies that "consciousness is the ground of all being." Even followers of spiritual traditions that believe in worldly illusion will have problems with "Bleep." [3], Work was split between Toronto-based Mr. X Inc., Lost Boys Studios in Vancouver, and Atomic Visual Effects in Cape Town, South Africa. But no scientific discovery has proved so ripe for spiritual projection as the theories of quantum physics, replete with their quixotic qualities of uncertainty, simultaneity and parallelism." They were spreading their methods of meditation but that was not the main thing that impressed me. For traditional Christians, God is God not because your brain is making him up, but because he is. We use it to assign probabilities to possible measurement outcomes on the basis of actual measurement outcomes. continue to use the site without a It's there. What the Bleep Do We Know!? In one experiment, people who were walking across a college campus were asked by a stranger for directions. In 1958 nasa started mapping the ocean and exploring it. You are free to comment as you wish. By continuing to browse the site Happy Water Crystals Debunked as PseudoScience June 23rd, 2018 - Are Dr Masaru Emoto?s Fantastic Claims Actually Real Via is masaru emoto . contact customer service But are there new, weird applications that people might see that have an impact on everyday life, beyond the woo-woo? Check my single page unpublishable http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf. "What the Bleep" misses opportunities to focus credibly on the fascinating work people like Newberg have been doing, and makes the science-and-faith field seem like quackery. Study Guide", "Teaching physics mysteries versus pseudoscience", "Review: What The Bleep Do We Know!? What the bleep do we know debunked Isn't life great? The debate here is that we'll be able to use quantum mechanics to break codes, in particular to determine the big prime numbers that are at the basis of the security of your credit cards and your bank cards. That would be, very hard to quantify:). The figures are a bit rubbery, but the idea that we're only 'aware' of a fraction of our brain's activity is both correct and a huge relief. Thanks to Pylon Sentinel for pointing this out.A link to his Wikipedia page is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Alan_Wolf And most thoughtful members of the "spiritual but not religious" camp would take issue if you chopped off their big toes and then responded to their complaints with a lofty "it's all in your mind." We're bombarded by many things every second of the day, and a result, we're not specially prepared quantum mechanical systems, nor can we exert weird quantum powers over other objects. Everything from the possibility of disappearing and reappearing, to the possibility of having strange new forms of communication. [12], Richard Dawkins stated that "the authors seem undecided whether their theme is quantum theory or consciousness. Now comes the audio edition of the book based on the mind-boggling movie that grossed $11 million in the U.S. alone. As the movie did, this book compels listeners to ask themselves Gre. Use these social-bookmarking links to share What the bleep are they on about?. kazakore (kazakore) January 14, 2010, 6:30pm #10 The movie "What the Bleep do we know" How much is true, or just entertainment. You might think that meant there were 18% fewer violent crimes than in the previous year, but the decrease was actually relative to his predicted increase based on some fancy statistical footwork. 5.Miceal Ledwith a clergyman with a rather dubious past (see http://unison.ie/irish_independent/stories.php3?ca=36&si=770458&issue_id=7565) is the one chosen by the film makers to be the theological spokesman. In the letter, the authors write: "the movie illustrates the uncertainty principle with a bouncing basketball being in several places at once. He says he is "profoundly unsympathetic to attempts at linking quantum mechanics with consciousness".[1]. You can begin to be skeptical that the speaker is somehow trying to use quantum mechanics to argue fundamentally that you can change the world by thinking about it. While the movie "What The Bleep" has some flaws from a science point of view, science of this type is so foreign to most people, that they feel they have to "jazz it up" to keep people interested. DO WE KNOW? This is the person who teaches the brain science in RSE. The main thing to know is that "observation" is a bad word for the process which goes on which we have inherited from the days when quantum mechanics was first discovered, and is unfortunately a bit easier to teach in introductory courses than decoherence. Real news, real hope. But I assume that's not quite right, and that sometimes quantum mechanics' name is taken in vain. This will be revisited if any. D (k)ow!? To date, there has been no response as to where the information which lead to the story about the indians not being able to see the ships of Columbus originated from. We must shake off the "ugly, superstitious, backwater concept of God" we learned as children, chides JZ Knight--uh, Ramtha. [11], Scientists who have reviewed What the Bleep Do We Know!? It's more like a collision in the editing room between talking heads, an impenetrable human parable and a hallucinogenic animated cartoon. If it were manifest, you could run at a wall a lot of times, and every now and then you'd spontaneously appear on the other side of the wall. Moreover, assume that they want your money. This movie agrees with the scientists as far as the existence of the so called empty space is concerned. Present thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but,. In the movie What the Bleep Do We Know?, physicists, biologists and the occasional chiropractor tell us how quantum physics and neuroscience support their views on consciousness. It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. (commonly referred to by its spoken title What the Bleep Do We Know) is a 2004 pseudoscientific film that supports the idea that consciousness and quantum mechanics are somehow related. Miceal Ledwith Blech. is a book of amazing science, and now the international bestselling book is available in paperback. But how are ordinary mortals to judge its assertions about the nature of matter, mind, and the universe? 2004 ( ) ( ) Offline 2013. "What the bleep. "If thoughts can do that to water, imagine what our thoughts can do to us" observed a fan of Dr Masaru Emoto in the movie. The quantum world does pervade everything around us, but as Richard Feynman liked to say, "Scientific creativity is imagination in a straitjacket." It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles this only applies to sub-atomic particlesa rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. Marlee Matlin, Barry Newman, Elaine Hendrix. You may or may not believe that there's an external reality beyond what your brain creates; the topic will be a perennial and fertile source of discussion. As he told ABC's "This Week" the day after the debate: "When it . "What the Bleep Do We Know," a pseudoscientific docudrama that purports to link quantum mechanics and consciousness, would be a riot if people didn't take it so seriously. You dont have a Christian Science Monitor Publishers Weekly What the Bleep Do We Know!? Dr Joe Dispenza and Miceal Ledwith are both long time students and appointed teachers at Ramthas school of enlightenment (RSE). Moreover, the movie proposes no plausible physical mechanism by which thoughts influence matter. The sub-atomic particles that make up the atoms that make up the rock are there too." Doesn't the quantum world pervade everything that we see around us? That beliefs about who one is and what is real are a direct cause of oneself and of one's own realities. "[15], Bernie Hobbs, a science writer with ABC Science Online, explains why the film is incorrect about quantum physics and reality: "The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. But when you get hit with so much information that's been edited to within a frame of its life, things get a bit confusing. We believe news can and should expand a sense of identity and possibility beyond narrow conventional expectations. I don't know how many times I've heard people say, "Oh, I love quantum mechanics because I'm really into meditation, or I love the spiritual benefits that it brings me." "[20], Journalist John Gorenfeld, writing in Salon, notes that the film's three directors are students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment, which he says has been described as a cult. up and at each step we're eliminating information and finally what is bubbling up to consciousness is the one that is most self-serving. is released on Friday. [6], The Institute of Noetic Sciences, a New Age research organization that "explores phenomena that do not necessarily fit conventional scientific models", has supported What the Bleep Do We Know!? The comments focus primarily on a single theme: "We create our own reality." And in fact we can make weird quantum phenomena happen. Knight's compound outside the town of Yelm has been built over the former horse-breeding grounds: The estate consists of JZ's present home, a white 12,800 square foot French chateau styled 4-bedroom house, her original home (a 1,600 sq.